> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://docs.keeta.com/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://docs.keeta.com/industry-comparison/keeta-vs.-ethereum.md).

# Keeta vs. Ethereum

One of Keeta's key innovations is its built-in rule engine and tokenization system, eliminating the need for external smart contracts. While Ethereum has led in decentralized applications and smart contracts, it faces significant scalability challenges. To increase transaction throughput, Ethereum relies on layer-2 solutions like rollups, which introduce complexities and costs. These rollups batch transactions and later verify them on the main blockchain but have drawbacks like delayed finality and dependence on centralized sequencers, raising the risk of single points of failure.

Keeta avoids these issues by integrating scalability directly into its core architecture. Using a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) structure—a system that allows for multiple simultaneous transaction pathways—it achieves high throughput and near-instantaneous transaction validation without additional layers. Keeta's built-in mechanisms cover most of the use cases, rendering general-purpose smart contracts unnecessary.

Functionalities such as data access and identity management, often implemented through smart contracts on other platforms, are inherently built into Keeta. This ensures users can perform transactions and access services at minimal cost, regardless of network demand. The platform becomes more accessible to regulated institutions and everyday users, offering a smoother and more predictable experience compared to Ethereum, which continues to struggle with high fees despite multiple upgrades.

In essence, while Ethereum is a well-established platform with a vast ecosystem, its reliance on general-purpose smart contracts introduces complexity and inefficiency. Keeta offers superior scalability and cost efficiency by providing built-in solutions tailored to specific needs without the overhead of smart contracts. This makes it a more attractive option for financial institutions and developers seeking a future-proof solution.

<table data-full-width="true"><thead><tr><th>KEETA</th><th>ETHEREUM</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10,000,000 TPS</td><td>120 TPS</td></tr><tr><td>400 MS settlement times</td><td>12,000 MS settlement times</td></tr><tr><td>≈ $0.00005 transaction fee</td><td>≈ $3.46 transaction fee</td></tr><tr><td>Delegated Proof-of-Stake</td><td>Proof-of-Stake</td></tr><tr><td>Built-in rules engine</td><td>Custom Smart Contract Logic Required</td></tr></tbody></table>


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:

```
GET https://docs.keeta.com/industry-comparison/keeta-vs.-ethereum.md?ask=<question>&goal=<endgoal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.
