Keeta Network
  • Introduction
  • Architecture
    • Data Structure
    • Consensus
      • Voting Power
      • Votes
      • Vote Stapling
  • Components
    • Ledger
    • Blocks
    • Nodes
      • Ledger Pruning
    • Accounts
      • Permissions
    • Key Pairs
      • Storing Key Pairs
    • Certificates
      • Creating and Attaching Certificates
  • Security
    • Digital Signatures
    • Post Quantum Readiness
    • Data Integrity
    • Protection From Common Attacks
  • Scalability
    • Benchmarks and Performance Metrics
    • Seperating Nodes from Hardware
    • Eliminating Mempools
  • Features
    • Identity Profiles
      • Utilizing Identity Profiles
    • Native Tokenization
      • Creating Tokens
      • Built-in Rules Engine
    • Anchors
      • Creating an Anchor
  • Applications
    • Public Network
    • Private Sub Network
  • Industry Comparison
    • Keeta Network's Advantage
    • Resolving the Blockchain Trilemma
    • Keeta vs. Ethereum
    • Keeta vs. Ripple
    • Keeta vs. Solana
  • Other Documentation
    • Official Links
    • Tokenomics
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Industry Comparison

Keeta vs. Ripple

Ripple has long faced criticism over centralization concerns due to its consensus mechanism, which depends on a limited number of trusted validators—fewer than 35—to maintain the ledger. With Ripple Labs operating many of these validators and holding significant influence over the network, it forces a centralized structure, increasing the risk of manipulation and governance issues. In contrast, Keeta offers a completely decentralized version of the network. By employing Delegated Proof of Stake (dPoS) and a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) structure, Keeta allows for a broader, more decentralized set of validators to govern the network and enables the network participants to choose these validators. Keeta also provides the ability to launch subnets, which are private versions of the network that can be utilized for a variety of use cases, allowing operations to be completed outside of the main blockchain and in a centralized environment, but with the same performance.

Ripple's XRP Ledger lacks capabilities in tokenization, built-in rules, identity management, and flexibility for handling diverse use cases. Its functionalities are largely limited to payment-related operations, restricting its versatility. Although Ripple is developing more advanced programmability—such as Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible sidechains to enable smart contracts—these efforts are still in progress and may inherit issues similar to Ethereum, including scalability challenges and high transaction costs.

Keeta, on the other hand, eliminates the need for external smart contracts by incorporating a built-in rule engine and tokenization system that covers most of the real-world use cases. By avoiding the complexities of general-purpose smart contracts, Keeta inherently provides functionalities like data access, identity management, and customizable rules within the platform.

KEETA
RIPPLE

10,000,000 TPS

1,500 TPS

400 MS settlement times

3000 - 5000 MS settlement times

≈ $0.00005 transaction fee

≈ $0.0002 transaction fee

Delegated Proof-of-Stake

Ripple Consensus Algorithm

Native Token Implementation

Lacks Sophisticated Programmable Contract Capabilities

PreviousKeeta vs. EthereumNextKeeta vs. Solana

Last updated 1 month ago